LexOrbis
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn

Menu

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Who we are
    • Our People
    • Our Reach
  • Practice
    • Patents
    • Designs
    • Trademarks
    • Copyright
  • Global IP Solutions
    • Patent Search & Analytics
      • Knock-out Search
      • Patentability Search
      • Freedom to Operate
      • Invalidity Search
      • Infringement Search
      • Competitor Watch
      • Landscape / White Space Analysis
    • Patent Drafting
    • Global Patent Filing & Prosecution
      • Pre-Filing Review
      • Patent Drawings
      • Application Preparation and E-filing
      • Office Action Response
      • IDS Management
      • Post Allowance Review
      • Patent Proofreading
      • PTA Calculation
      • Paralegal Support
    • Trademark Search & Watch
      • Trademark Comprehensive Search
      • Trademark Watch
      • Counterfeit Watch
      • Domain Name Watch
    • Global Trademark Filing & Prosecution
      • Pre-Filing Review
      • Application Preparation and E-filing
      • Examination Report Response
      • Paralegal Support
    • IP Portfolio Management
      • IP Docketing
      • Data Validation
      • Invoice Management and Spend Analysis
      • IP Recordals
      • Patent Annuities
      • Trademark Renewals and Restoration
      • Special Projects
  • Updates
  • Events
  • Recognitions
  • Careers
  • Contact

Articles

Trademark Squatting in the Beauty Industry: A Case of Bad Faith Registration

February 18, 2025May 13, 2025 LexOrbis Articles, Trademark
Trademark Squatting in the Beauty Industry: A Case of Bad Faith Registration

The present case revolves around a dispute concerning trademark registration in the beauty and personal care industry. The petitioner, Goodai Global Inc., a […]

Battle of the Brands: Trademark Dispute in the Pharmaceutical Industry

February 15, 2025May 13, 2025 LexOrbis Articles, Trademark
Battle of the Brands: Trademark Dispute in the Pharmaceutical Industry

The present case involves a trademark dispute between two pharmaceutical companies, M/s Apex Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. (Plaintiff) and Macleods Pharmaceuticals Limited (Defendant), over […]

Balancing Tradition With Innovation: Analysing The Draft Guidelines For Processing Patent Applications Of AYUSH Systems And Related Inventions

February 13, 2025 LexOrbis Articles, Patent
Balancing Tradition With Innovation: Analysing The Draft Guidelines For Processing Patent Applications Of AYUSH Systems And Related Inventions

The AYUSH system, which includes Ayurveda, Yoga & Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha, Sowa-Rigpa, and Homeopathy, is an integral part of India’s healthcare traditions, with […]

When Similar Sounds Don’t Infringe: The Case of PhonePe vs. BundlePe

February 13, 2025May 13, 2025 LexOrbis Articles, Trademark
When Similar Sounds Don’t Infringe: The Case of PhonePe vs. BundlePe

The case of PhonePe Private Limited vs. BundlePe Innovations Pvt. Ltd. revolves around allegations of trademark infringement and passing off. PhonePe, a leading […]

Mice not meek over morality and amendment

February 12, 2025 LexOrbis Articles, Patent
Mice not meek over morality and amendment

Section 3(b) of the Indian Patents Act, 1970 (act), prohibits the patenting of an invention that is intended to be used or exploited […]

Balancing Justice and Procedure: Supreme Court Clarifies the Scope of Section 82 of CrPC and Section 174A of IPC

February 12, 2025 LexOrbis Articles, Others
Balancing Justice and Procedure: Supreme Court Clarifies the Scope of Section 82 of CrPC and Section 174A of IPC

The Supreme Court, in its recent judgment in Criminal Appeal No. 4359 of 2024, dated January 2, 2025, addressed critical issues concerning the […]

DROTIN vs. DROTOWIN: A Battle of Pharmaceutical Trademarks

February 10, 2025May 19, 2025 LexOrbis Articles, Trademark
DROTIN vs. DROTOWIN: A Battle of Pharmaceutical Trademarks

The plaintiffs, comprising four entities—Cedar Properties and Trading LLP, Martin and Harris Laboratories Limited, Martin & Harris (P) Ltd., and Walter Bushnell Private […]

Protecting JAVA: Oracle’s Trademark Victory

February 8, 2025May 19, 2025 LexOrbis Articles, Trademark
Protecting JAVA: Oracle’s Trademark Victory

The present case concerns a trademark dispute between Oracle America, Inc. (the petitioner) and Mr. Sandeep Khandelwal (the first respondent), regarding the unauthorised […]

MPP vs Matrix: A Clash Over Trademark Use in Business Relationships

February 8, 2025May 19, 2025 LexOrbis Articles, Trademark
MPP vs Matrix: A Clash Over Trademark Use in Business Relationships

The case of MPP Technologies Private Limited vs M/s. Matrix Architectural Solutions & Anr. centred on allegations of trademark infringement and passing off […]

Astellas Pharma’s Trademark Triumph: Protecting a Global Brand

February 7, 2025May 19, 2025 LexOrbis Articles, Trademark
Astellas Pharma's Trademark Triumph: Protecting a Global Brand

Astellas Pharma Inc., a leading multinational pharmaceutical company, filed the present suit against Astellaz Pharmaceuticals, seeking a permanent injunction to restrain the defendant […]

Post navigation

← Older posts
Newer posts →

News & Updates

  • News (111)
  • Copyright (108)
  • Patent (430)
  • Trademark (447)
  • Others (591)
    • Events (43)
  • Recognitions (111)

Recent Posts

  • Decoding the New Regime for Biodiversity Access Benefit Sharing May 12, 2025
  • Awareness Program on ESG Sustainability for MSMEs and Sustainable Business Practices May 9, 2025
  • GCCI GATE Conclave May 9, 2025
  • The India Sterile Injectable Summit 2025 May 9, 2025
  • Ensuring Accountability in OTT Content: Government Tightens Ethical and Legal Compliance Framework May 8, 2025

Archives

Subscribe

Name

Email


© 2025 - Lexorbis. All Rights Reserved.   Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use

This website follows the relevant rules of the Bar Council of India. By clicking, “I Agree” below, the user acknowledges and confirms that the contents of website are meant to provide necessary information about the firm, LexOrbis and updates on relevant laws in India. The information provided herein is not legal advice, and the Firm disclaims all liability arising from reliance placed by the user on the information contained therein. The Firm has made all efforts to ensure the accuracy of the contents of this website. The user also confirms that there has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from the Firm or any of its members to solicit any work or advertise through this website.

Please read and accept this Website’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before accessing the same.

I Agree I Disagree