LexOrbis
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn

Menu

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Who we are
    • Our People
    • Our Reach
  • Practice
    • Patents
    • Designs
    • Trademarks
    • Copyright
  • Global IP Solutions
    • Patent Search & Analytics
      • Knock-out Search
      • Patentability Search
      • Freedom to Operate
      • Invalidity Search
      • Infringement Search
      • Competitor Watch
      • Landscape / White Space Analysis
    • Patent Drafting
    • Global Patent Filing & Prosecution
      • Pre-Filing Review
      • Patent Drawings
      • Application Preparation and E-filing
      • Office Action Response
      • IDS Management
      • Post Allowance Review
      • Patent Proofreading
      • PTA Calculation
      • Paralegal Support
    • Trademark Search & Watch
      • Trademark Comprehensive Search
      • Trademark Watch
      • Counterfeit Watch
      • Domain Name Watch
    • Global Trademark Filing & Prosecution
      • Pre-Filing Review
      • Application Preparation and E-filing
      • Examination Report Response
      • Paralegal Support
    • IP Portfolio Management
      • IP Docketing
      • Data Validation
      • Invoice Management and Spend Analysis
      • IP Recordals
      • Patent Annuities
      • Trademark Renewals and Restoration
      • Special Projects
  • Updates
  • Events
  • Recognitions
  • Careers
  • Contact

Trademark

Louis Vuitton’s Triumph Over Counterfeit Commerce

February 17, 2025May 21, 2025 LexOrbis Articles, Trademark
Louis Vuitton’s Triumph Over Counterfeit Commerce

The case of Louis Vuitton Malletier vs Rahul Bose revolves around the plaintiff, Louis Vuitton Malletier, a globally renowned luxury fashion house, seeking […]

The Battle of Respect: SVAMAAN vs. SAMMAAN in Trademark Infringement

February 15, 2025May 21, 2025 LexOrbis Articles, Trademark
The Battle of Respect: SVAMAAN vs. SAMMAAN in Trademark Infringement

The case of Svamaan Financial Services Private Limited vs Sammaan Capital Limited & Ors. revolves around a dispute concerning trademark infringement and passing […]

Battle of the Brands: Trademark Dispute in the Pharmaceutical Industry

February 15, 2025May 13, 2025 LexOrbis Articles, Trademark
Battle of the Brands: Trademark Dispute in the Pharmaceutical Industry

The present case involves a trademark dispute between two pharmaceutical companies, M/s Apex Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. (Plaintiff) and Macleods Pharmaceuticals Limited (Defendant), over […]

Spirited Confusion: The Battle Over ‘KYRON’ and ‘MYRON’ in India’s Liquor Trade

February 14, 2025May 21, 2025 LexOrbis Articles, Trademark
Spirited Confusion: The Battle Over ‘KYRON’ and ‘MYRON’ in India’s Liquor Trade

The petitioner, Allied Blenders and Distillers Limited (ABDL), a prominent manufacturer of alcoholic beverages, sought the cancellation of respondent no. 1’s (Boutique Spirit […]

When Similar Sounds Don’t Infringe: The Case of PhonePe vs. BundlePe

February 13, 2025May 13, 2025 LexOrbis Articles, Trademark
When Similar Sounds Don’t Infringe: The Case of PhonePe vs. BundlePe

The case of PhonePe Private Limited vs. BundlePe Innovations Pvt. Ltd. revolves around allegations of trademark infringement and passing off. PhonePe, a leading […]

DROTIN vs. DROTOWIN: A Battle of Pharmaceutical Trademarks

February 10, 2025May 19, 2025 LexOrbis Trademark, Articles
DROTIN vs. DROTOWIN: A Battle of Pharmaceutical Trademarks

The plaintiffs, comprising four entities—Cedar Properties and Trading LLP, Martin and Harris Laboratories Limited, Martin & Harris (P) Ltd., and Walter Bushnell Private […]

Protecting JAVA: Oracle’s Trademark Victory

February 8, 2025May 19, 2025 LexOrbis Articles, Trademark
Protecting JAVA: Oracle’s Trademark Victory

The present case concerns a trademark dispute between Oracle America, Inc. (the petitioner) and Mr. Sandeep Khandelwal (the first respondent), regarding the unauthorised […]

MPP vs Matrix: A Clash Over Trademark Use in Business Relationships

February 8, 2025May 19, 2025 LexOrbis Articles, Trademark
MPP vs Matrix: A Clash Over Trademark Use in Business Relationships

The case of MPP Technologies Private Limited vs M/s. Matrix Architectural Solutions & Anr. centred on allegations of trademark infringement and passing off […]

Astellas Pharma’s Trademark Triumph: Protecting a Global Brand

February 7, 2025May 19, 2025 LexOrbis Articles, Trademark
Astellas Pharma's Trademark Triumph: Protecting a Global Brand

Astellas Pharma Inc., a leading multinational pharmaceutical company, filed the present suit against Astellaz Pharmaceuticals, seeking a permanent injunction to restrain the defendant […]

A Trademark Dispute in the Power Solutions Industry

February 7, 2025May 19, 2025 LexOrbis Articles, Trademark
A Trademark Dispute in the Power Solutions Industry

The present case revolves around a trademark dispute between Anitha M., the proprietor of “Servo Power Solutions” (the plaintiff), and Yanamala Girija and […]

Post navigation

← Older posts
Newer posts →

News & Updates

  • Copyright (119)
  • Patent (468)
  • Trademark (464)
  • Others (630)
    • Events (67)
  • Recognitions (117)
  • News (114)

Recent Posts

  • Conduct Separate Hearings For Examination And Pre-grant Opposition: Calcutta High Court Directs November 6, 2025
  • E-commerce Platforms Accountable For Curbing Counterfeits In The Growing Digital Age November 6, 2025
  • Legal Infirmities In Refusal Of A Patent: Calcutta High Court Rules Remand Inevitable October 29, 2025
  • Technical Advancement Required To Secure Patent: Delhi High Court Affirms October 29, 2025
  • Lights, camera action! Don’t forget the taxes October 27, 2025

Archives

Subscribe

Name

Email


© 2025 - Lexorbis. All Rights Reserved.   Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use

This website follows the relevant rules of the Bar Council of India. By clicking, “I Agree” below, the user acknowledges and confirms that the contents of website are meant to provide necessary information about the firm, LexOrbis and updates on relevant laws in India. The information provided herein is not legal advice, and the Firm disclaims all liability arising from reliance placed by the user on the information contained therein. The Firm has made all efforts to ensure the accuracy of the contents of this website. The user also confirms that there has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from the Firm or any of its members to solicit any work or advertise through this website.

Please read and accept this Website’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before accessing the same.

I Agree I Disagree